I have some Thoughts and Feelings about Jurassic World!
Spoiler alert, I'm going to talk about details and plot points and this post is
really for people who have seen the film. Also, while I'm going to talk about
the dinosaurs a bit, this isn't really a review of the science of the film,
because that's already been done to death. Ok, onwards and upwards into something that wound up being way too long!
Does Jurassic World hate dinosaurs?
I think the answer to that question is yes. Jurassic World
keeps making these little homages and throwbacks to the earlier films (there
are lots of shots that echo iconic moments in the earlier films, and some of
the plot points mirror the original film almost exactly), and yet I feel like
we could consider the theme of Jurassic World to be about rejecting nostalgia
and childhood. It's buried under an interesting discussion of the role of the
military in funding scientific research, and why some kinds of research are
prioritized over others, and it may actually be unintentional, but it's the
theme I took away most immediately from this film.
There are two characters that I think are supposed to
represent the audience, and neither are treated particularly well by the other
characters. And by 'the audience', I'm going to be really self-centered and say
that I mean the 30-somethings like myself who saw the original film when we
were in that 8-12 year old bracket, or 'peak Jurassic Park' age, and who this
film is clearly pandering to. Firstly, we have Gray Mitchell, a 10-ish year old
who represents us when we first saw Jurassic Park: he's a dinosaur geek and is
one of the only characters to show unrelenting enthusiasm for dinosaurs while
visiting Jurassic World. Secondly, we have Lowery, the 30-something computer
room dude, who wears an original Jurassic Park shirt and has dinosaur toys on
his desk and is obviously super into the dinosaurs in the dinosaur theme park.
He is us, now, grown up and nostalgic for the original film. Multiple times
throughout the film, Gray's older brother tells him he needs to grow up, and
points out that many of the things are for little kids. Claire makes fun of
Lowery's shirt, and I think in general we're supposed to think he's kind of a
weird man-child who hasn't really grown up.
There's a moment in the film where Gray and his brother Zach
stumble upon the old Jurassic Park visitor center building. The T. rex cast
skeleton lies on the ground covered in vegetation, and a little piece of the
"When Dinosaurs Ruled the Earth" banner is visible. Zach uses it to
make a torch so they can investigate the rest of the suspiciously-well-lit
ruins. Visiting the old building felt like some gratuitous fan-service to me,
but then burning the banner felt like a purposeful statement about rejecting
the nostalgia of the original film.
Jurassic World is constantly setting up little nostalgic
moments and then seemingly stomping all over them. It's like the filmmakers
wanted to pay tribute to Jurassic Park but then were embarassed to show that
they liked it – or maybe they didn't really like that movie at all, but wanted
to make lots of money (success!). I don't know, but I find it thematically
problematic and a bit sad, since the excitement over DINOSAURS! in the first
movie is one of the defining aspects of that film, and that sense of wonder and
grandeur has rarely been replicated. Jurassic World feels jaded, and like it's
too cool for dinosaurs.
Can we talk about ladies in this movie for a moment?
Did we really need to introduce our main female character
with the
camera sweeping up her
legs to her face? Was that absolutely necessary?
Also, could we just not use the 'frigid, uptight workaholic woman needs to
learn to loosen up and become sexually free with a man, and also needs to
remember that all women will have children eventually' stereotype? COULD WE
JUST NOT?
It's an intriguing throwback to the original Jurassic Park
movie, which I feel successfully used the kids as a character development point
for Alan Grant. But Sam Neill managed to portray Grant's discomfort with kids
in a more organic way, and the movie gave that plotline a bit of breathing room
to develop during some of its quieter moments AND its action sequences (see:
sitting in the tree feeding Brachiosaurus; escaping the falling car in the
tree; the fence). It's less believable with Claire Dearing, because she doesn't
even spend any time with the kids in peril until almost the very end of the
movie, at which point she basically worried herself into liking kids? Or
something?
Look, not every movie is going to have (or should have) a
Strong Female Character(TM), because there are lots of ways to be a lady just
like there are lots of ways to be a dude. But the first two Jurassic Park
movies had some cool female characters: Ellie Sattler, a palaeobotanist, who
was brave and curious and smart! Lex Murphy, who knew those UNIX systems! Sarah
Harding, who was a bit foolish but was also brave and curious! Kelly Curtis
Malcolm, who gymnastic-ed a Velociraptor to death! In Jurassic World, we get a
woman who has great power and authority (she runs a theme park full of
dinosaurs!) being told she should be different at almost every opportunity, and
we get a distracted babysitter who is killed in the most gratuitous, drawn-out
sequence of all. Thanks, movie.
Ok, now let's actually talk about dinosaurs (and other
prehistoric creatures) in Jurassic World.
Other palaeontologists have already beaten me to much of
this, but I still had a few thoughts I wanted to share. Ultimately I don't have
a big problem with the 'retro' dinosaurs of 1993 appearing in this film,
because I'm willing to go with the flow in terms of continuity. But there were
some pretty dumb things in this film:
· The pterosaur sequence was pretty godawful and
brought the action to a screeching halt. I can't suspend disbelief that the
pterosaurs would immediately rampage and murder a bunch of people, and I can't
suspend disbelief over the physics of that sequence. Refrigerating that
babysitter lady was also pretty awful. Sweet jeepers, Jurassic World, you're
going to make me say something horrible: this sequence was better in Jurassic
Park III. THERE. I hope you're happy.
· I never really bought Indominus rex as anything
more than a really big Allosaurus or Saurophaganax. (Sorry, theropod people!
Allosaurus is cool, but not, like, THAT cool.) I did, however, like the
incorporation of the camouflage idea from the Carnotaurus in the Lost World
book, something that I had missed from the film adaptation. Overall, I'm
frustrated that Indominus exists mostly so they had a dinosaur they could
trademark. Because that's totally what that is, and everything else is
secondary to that, including its incorporation into the plot.
· That mosasaur is just so gigantic. I'm on board,
but that was starting to stretch credulity as well.
· Why doesn't Rexy eat Blue after the fight? The
mind boggles.
Ok, things I liked!
· The Ankylosaurus gives Indominus the old
what-for and doesn't immediately die like everything else! Indominus needs to
really work at murdering that poor fellow. The design of the Ankylosaurus
themselves is pretty terrible (wrong osteoderms, tail too curly, nostrils in
the wrong spot, head generally a bit off), although I think it's meant to be
consistent with Jurassic Park III.
Here's what Ankylosaurus REALLY looks like!
· Dinosaur petting zoo! It should be for all ages!
· The big kaiju battle between Indominus and
Tyrannosaurus was pretty well matched. I liked the little kick to JPIII when
the Tyrannosaurus busts through the Spinosaurus skeleton on the way to the
fight.
· "Are they safe?" "Oh no, under no
circumstances, not even a little."
Some final Thoughts and Feelings
I haven't decided yet if I liked Jurassic World. I can't
help but think back to the original Jurassic Park with its iconic visual
moments and charming, if hokey, dialogue. While it was fun to see an
operational Jurassic Park with rides and attractions, I don't feel like
Jurassic World had much visual flair. It's really hard to beat dramatic,
symbolic visuals like this:
Interesting camera angles like this:
Or quiet moments of terror like this:
And I miss the yellow and green and red colour palette of
the original park, replaced here with chrome and blue and silver like every
other washed out movie in theatres lately. It is also interesting that all of
the big sweeping themes from the original soundtrack are used not for the
dinosaurs, but for the manmade structures of the park itself. It really does
feel like Jurassic World doesn't care about dinosaurs.