Kulindadromeus, a little ornithischian from the Jurassic of
Siberia, has the palaeosphere abuzz with talk of fluff, feathers, scales, and
all kinds of interesting integumentary goodness. Kulindadromeus has scales on
its feet, hands, and tail, but the head, body, and upper limbs are covered in
three different kinds of filamentous integument.
Beautiful restoration of Kulindadromeus by Andrey Atuchin, via National Geographic.
Feathers and fluff are
extensively known in coelurosaurian theropods (and possibly other theropods as
well), but are more controversial in ornithischians. Bristle- or quill-like
structures are known in the little ceratopsian Psittacosaurus, and in the
'heterodontosaur' Tianyulong, but since these structures are so different than
the filaments and feathers of theropods, there's been some debate about whether
or not they evolved independently of true feathers.
A not-so-great photo of a cast of the quilled Psittacosaurus specimen at the Carnegie Museum (look towards the top of the photo for the long, thin filaments), and a life restoration in the museum as well.
In Kulindadromeus, the torso and head are adorned with
simple filaments that are thinner than the quill-like bristles in
Psittacosaurus and Tianyulong. There are tufted plumes, where multiple
filaments converge to a scale-like base, on the upper arm and upper leg.
Finally, there are some ribbon-like clusters of filaments on the shins. The
tufted plumes still aren't really like anything in the theropods, but the fact
that they are branching filaments certainly suggests these are more
feather-like than the quills of other ornithischians.
Besides its amazing fluff, Kulindadromeus is pretty neat for
a couple of other reasons: 1) we don't really have a lot of dinosaurs from
Siberia, so anything new from this region is cool!, and 2) basal things are
always interesting, and 3) its non-feathery integument is super interesting!
Kulindadromeus is a little more derived than Agilisaurus or Stormbergia, but is
still in a relatively basal position in Neornithischia, the clade of
ornithischian dinosaurs that includes everything except thyreophorans
(ankylosaurs and stegosaurs), 'heterodontosaurs' like Heterodontosaurus,
Fruitadens, and Tianyulong, and the most basal ornithischians like
Pisanosaurus. The scales on its tail remind me of aetosaur osteoderms, but lack
any bone and so aren't osteoderms, but true epidermal structures.
Anyway, I've been thinking about dinosaur skin a lot lately,
having written papers on ankylosaur scale pattern diversity and soft-tissue crests in Edmontosaurus. In particular, I'm intrigued by the idea of scaly and
fluffy ornithischians. We know that hadrosaurs and ankylosaurs had scaly skin,
but does that preclude having fluff too? Well, Kulindadromeus shows you can
totally have skin and fluff in different regions of the body. On the other
hand, lots of large mammals today lack hair over most of their body, so large
dinosaurs may have done the same.
Most of the ankylosaur skin impressions I know of come from
Alberta, where the conditions are not ideal for preserving feathers and fluff.
However, it's not impossible – feathers have been reported from ornithomimids from Alberta, so maybe we just need to look more carefully in the future. I
think the idea of a fluffy ankylosaur probably seems preposterous – how could
such an armoured, osteodermy animal have filaments in addition to its tough
scales? And it's true – most animals today with osteoderms, like crocodiles,
turtles, and lizards, don't have fluff. But there's one group of animals around
today that very definitely have osteoderms and fluff:
Via Arkive.
Here's the big hairy armadillo, Chaetophractus villosus.
It's one of the fuzziest of the armadillos, with lots of coarse hair on its
belly, but also hairs growing off of the individual scutes (if I understand
correctly). I'm not going to argue that ankylosaurs definitely had this kind of
morphology – armadillos, being mammals, have totally different osteoderms than
ankylosaurs that evolved on their own independent evolutionary pathway, and
mammal hair/skin and ankylosaur skin are very different. Additionally, we now
have evidence for branching filamentous structures as far back as Neornithischia,
but ankylosaurs lie outside of that clade (Tianyulong, with its quills, is more
basal than ankylosaurs). But being an armoured, osteodermy animal does not always
rule out also being a gross hairy thing. Because seriously, look at that guy.
Or better yet,
make it a screaming hairy Pseudoplocephalus, like Chaetophractus vellerosus.
Papers! (And if anyone has any literature on big hairy armadillos, please send it my way!)
Arbour VM, Burns ME, Bell PR, Currie PJ. 2014. Epidermal and dermal integumentary structures of ankylosaurian dinosaurs. Journal of Morphology 275:39-50. [Paywalled! Accessible post here.]
Bell PR, Fanti F, Currie PJ, Arbour VM. 2014. A mummified duck-billed dinosaur with a soft-tissue cock's comb. Current Biology 24:70-75. [Paywalled! Accessible post here.]
Godefroit P, Sinitsa SM, Shouailly D, Bolotsky YL, Sizov AV, McNamara ME, Benton MJ, Spagna P. 2014. A Jurassic ornithischian dinosaur from Siberia with both feathers and scales. Science 345:451-455. [Paywalled! Accessible post here.]
Mayr G, Peters SD, Plodowski G, Vogel O. 2002. Bristle-like integumentary structures at the tail of the horned dinosaur Psittacosaurus. Naturwissenschaften 89:361-365. [Paywalled! Accessible post here.]
Zelenitsky DK, Therrien F, Erickson GM, DeBuhr CL, Kobayashi Y, Eberth DA, Hadfield F. 2012. Feathered non-avian dinosaurs from North America provide insight into wing origins. Science 338:510-514. [Paywalled! Accessible post here.]
Zheng X-T, You H-L, Xu X, Dong Z-M. 2009. An Early Cretaceous heterodontosaurid dinosaur with filamentous integumentary structures. Nature 458:333-336. [Paywalled! Accessible post here.]
One of the hairiest and most remarkable-looking armadillos is probably the hairy long-nosed armadillo, but there is unfortunately very little information on it.
ReplyDeleteOh wow! That is like the hairiest armadillo of them all!
DeleteGreat post. I've been pondering on this very subject myself recently in relation to nodosaurids, prompted by reconstructions of Glyptodon that often show it with hair as well as its very dense shield of osteroderms. I haven't read up on Glyptodon dermal armour so don't know if there is direct evidence for hair on this critter or whether it's a palaeoart meme.
ReplyDeleteIt wouldn't surprise me at all if we found out ankylosaurs were hairy, or at least a bit bristly.