Saturday, May 21, 2011

Ankylosaur tail pathologies.

My most recent paper with my coauthor and supervisor Phil Currie appeared online at Historical Biology this week. It is the last of the chapters from my MSc on ankylosaur tail club biomechanics (although I am still working on ankylosaurs, the focus is now on the phylogenetic relationships within the ankylosaurids and their biogeography). However, it contains very little about the biomechanics of tail clubs...

Most of my MSc thesis used a lot of math and fancy-dancy computer modeling to look at whether it is biologically feasible for ankylosaurids to have used their tail clubs for forceful impacts (and therefore as offensive or defensive weapons). But another way to look for evidence of behaviour is to look for injuries, which can sometimes, if you’re lucky, give you clues about some of the more dramatic moments in an animal’s life. So as I was looking at specimens for my MSc (and into my PhD), I always kept an eye open for anything unusual or abnormal that could be a pathology.

What I would love to tell you is that I found healing fractures in the handle vertebrae or knob of the tail club, because that would be pretty good evidence that ankylosaurids were smashing things with their tails. Sadly, I have not seen anything like that in any of the tail club specimens I’ve seen. There are several explanations for the absence of handle pathologies:
  1. Ankylosaurids did not use their tails for forceful impacts.
  2. Ankylosaurids did use their tails for forceful impacts, but the impact forces were never enough to cause the tail to break.
  3. Ankylosaurids did use their tails for forceful impacts, and the impact forces were so great that a fracture was probably catastrophic and unlikely to heal.
  4. Ankylosaurids did use their tails for forceful impacts, and injuries occurred sometimes, but we haven’t found any injured specimens yet.
Out of all of the above scenarios, I think #4 is the most likely. Ankylosaurids could pack a wallop with their tails, especially those with the largest knobs. I am quite sure injuries occurred sometimes, but I bet they were reasonably rare and the chances of finding a healed tail club are probably low.

What else did we find? Well, there’s a tail club knob that may have become infected – it’s on display at the Royal Tyrrell Museum Field Station if you happen to be visiting Dinosaur Provincial Park this summer, and you can check it out for yourself. There's a big hole on the right major osteoderm, and this osteoderm is also much taller in posterior view.


In two pelvis specimens, I saw large holes where some of the sacral vertebrae attach to the ilium. One of these is AMNH 5337, on display in the Hall of Ornithischian Dinosaurs at the American Museum of Natural History. I am unsure what exactly may be causing these holes, but in the paper we speculate that they may be similar to the extra fenestrae that sometimes occur in ceratopsian frills (see Tanke and Farke 2007). Perhaps these are areas of low mechanical stress and the bone is simply resorbed. They are certainly unusual, and it would be interesting to see if any other dinosaurs show evidence of lesions like these.


And finally, several specimens of anterior free caudal vertebrae had rough, rugose bone textures on the neural spines and sometimes on the transverse processes. In two specimens (a Euoplocephalus at the AMNH and the Talarurus mount at the Palaeontological Institute in Moscow) some of these anterior vertebrae are fused together. At first I thought these might be infections, but as it turns out, the anterior caudal vertebrae of whales and crocodiles can fuse as a mechanical response to stress from swimming motions (see Galatius et al. 2009 and Mulder 2001). It is conceivable that this was occurring in ankylosaurids either as a response to keeping the heavy tail club elevated off that ground, or as a result of tail club swinging.

I wasn’t able to draw any definitive conclusions about tail-clubbing in ankylosaurs based on my pathology survey, and trying to diagnose bone pathologies in fossils is EXTREMELY challenging. Perhaps it is something that gets easier with time. But I had a lot of fun with this project and I think it is worthwhile to look at palaeopathologies as potential sources of information, as long as you’re careful how you interpret them.

References!

Arbour VM, Currie PJ. 2011. Tail and pelvis pathologies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs. Historical Biology, online 19 May 2011.

Galatius A, Sonne C, Kinze CC, Dietz R, Beck Jensen J-E. 2009. Occurrence of vertebral osteophytosis in a museum sample of whitebeaked dolphins (Lagenorhynchus albirostris) from Danish waters. Journal of Wildlife Disease 45:19–28.

Mulder EWA. 2001. Co-ossified vertebrae of mosasaurs and cetaceans: implications for the mode of locomotion of extinct marine reptiles. Paleobiology 27:724–734.

Tanke DH, Farke AA. 2007. Bone resorption, bone lesions, and extracranial fenestrae in ceratopsid dinosaurs: a preliminary assessment. In: Carpenter K (ed). Horns and beaks. Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Press. p. 319–348.

6 comments:

  1. If clubs were used for interspecific fighting i.e. used to strike armored bodies, we may find a busted handle someday. Coombs, however, doubted they were. For all practical purposes #2 is right if, as he wrote, clubs were used against the "fragile metatarsus of a menacing carnosaur."
    Btw as far as I know, the T. gigantea pathology paper was never published. Too bad; I wonder if the recently collected postcrania displays any additional pathologies.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Can you circle the holes you're talking about specifically? The picture is small and all i'm seeing are the normal spaces between the transverse processes?

    ReplyDelete
  3. CORRECTION: Above, I meant intraspecific fighting i.e. two ankylosaurs of the same species (hypothetically) battling with clubs.

    ReplyDelete
  4. My suggested interpretation of the pathologies:

    http://multiply.com/gi/ffd2009:notes:33

    Note: it's for members only but anyone can join.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous - on the pelvis picture, look at the left side and the fourth transverse process from the top. It's a little hard to see because of the glass reflections, but there's a sizable divot on the ilium in that area.

    Starman - Unfortunately the Tarchia skull pathology description exists only as an SVP abstract. Also I don't usually sign up for website unless I have to, but please feel free to post your interpretations in the comments here and I will respond as best I can.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yeah, I saw the abstract when it came out over a dozen years ago. Now that the postcrania has been collected an eventual paper on the specimen might as well include the skull and its pathology.

    ReplyDelete