I've covered many of the North American ankylosaurs in my
previous papers and blog posts. In 2013, I argued that what we thought was
Euoplocephalus was more likely 4 taxa – Anodontosaurus, Dyoplosaurus,
Scolosaurus, and Euoplocephalus proper. Then in 2014 we described a newankylosaurid, Ziapelta, from New Mexico. There are a few other taxa that had
previously been proposed to be ankylosaurids, so let's take a look at them
here.
Aletopelta, Stegopelta and Glyptodontopelta
Aletopelta is one of the more tantalizingly enigmatic
ankylosaurs from North America. It's from a weird place – California – which may
have been much further south 75 million years ago compared to its current
position. It was also found in marine sediments, and the decaying carcass had
formed a little reef, with oysters encrusting the ribs. The only known specimen
of Aletopelta is relatively complete, all things considered, with the osteoderms
in situ over part of the pelvis, the legs partially articulated, and with
various odds and ends like osteoderms and vertebrae. Unfortunately, the ends of
the bones are often chewed apart, and some of the material is a bit hard to
interpret.
Here's the articulated pelvis and hindlimbs, and some other armour pieces, on display at the San Diego Museum of Natural History.
Regardless, Aletopelta is a very interesting ankylosaur. It
has an unusual osteoderm morphology over the pelvis, with small hexagonal
osteoderms closely appressed to each other. Ankylosaur pelvic armour seems to
come in two major flavours: fused rosettes, like we saw in Dongyangopelta and
Taohelong (and perhaps most famously in Polacanthus), and interlocking
hexagons, like in Stegopelta, Glyptodontopelta, and Aletopelta. Tracy Ford
suggested that ankylosaurs with these hexagonal pelvic shields might represent
a clade (dubbed Stegopeltinae) of ankylosaurids. Glyptodontopelta has since
typically been interpreted as a nodosaurid, as has Stegopelta, but the most
recent interpretation of Aletopelta was that it was an ankylosaurid. In the revised phylogeny in my new paper, we found
Stegopelta and Glyptodontopelta as nodosaurids, but Aletopelta as a very basal
ankylosaurid. However, although Ford and Kirkland reconstructed Aletopelta with
the typical ankylosaurid tail club, I don't think that it possessed one: the
preserved distal caudal vertebrae don't show any of the lengthening or other
modifications that are characteristic of ankylosaurid handle vertebrae.
An updated restoration of the known elements in Aletopelta - the main differences between this and Ford and Kirkland's reconstruction are the absence of a tail club, and uncertainty over what the head should look like.
Cedarpelta
Cedarpelta is an important taxon for understanding the
biogeography and evolution of ankylosaurids, and I wish we had more specimens!
I don't have many new comments to add about this taxon, since Ken Carpenter
published a great description of the disarticulated skull back in 2001. Cedarpelta
has been interpreted as a shamosaurine ankylosaur, as a relative of taxa like
Gobisaurus and Shamosaurus (which I'll talk about in the next post) from Asia,
and thus may point towards a mid Cretaceous faunal interchange between these
two continents. In our revised phylogenetic analysis, we didn't find Cedarpelta
as the sister taxon to either Gobisaurus or Shamosaurus, but it does come out
as a basal ankylosaurid in their general neighbourhood, and I honestly wouldn't
be surprised if future analyses or new taxa show support for it as a
shamosaurine ankylosaur after all.
Nodocephalosaurus
Nodocephalosaurus! What a fun ankylosaur. It's really quite
unlike the other ankylosaurids from North America, which typically have flat,
hexagonal cranial ornamentation. Instead, Nodocephalosaurus has bulbous,
conical cranial ornamentation. Bulbous cranial ornamentation is typical of
Campanian-Maastrichtian Mongolian ankylosaurs like Saichania and Tarchia, but
in those taxa the ornamentation is pyramidal rather than conical. The front end
of the snout in Nodocephalosaurus is also unusual, because there's no obvious
narial opening and instead the ornamentation has a stepped appearance.
Hopefully better specimens with more complete snouts will resolve this weird
morphology. I've also reinterpreted the position of the quadratojugal horn
compared to Sullivan's original figures – the horn should be rotated forward so
that the bottom margin of the orbit is complete.
Nodocephalosaurus holotype skull in dorsal and left lateral views.
Tatankacephalus
I don't have much to say about Tatankacephalus because I
didn't look at the original material myself, but the previous phylogenetic
analysis by Thompson et al. recovered it as a nodosaurid rather than an
ankylosaurid as originally suggested by Parsons and Parsons, and we found the same result. Overall, Tatankacephalus is VERY
similar to Sauropelta, so this is perhaps not surprising.
Up next: More odds and ends, but after I return from Utah!
Arbour VM, Currie PJ. In press. Systematics, phylogeny and palaeobiogeography of the ankylosaurid dinosaurs. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology.
Arbour VM, Currie PJ. In press. Systematics, phylogeny and palaeobiogeography of the ankylosaurid dinosaurs. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology.
Aletopelta has distal caudal vertebrae? I haven't seen any, in fact, I've barely seen any vertebrae from Aletopelta.
ReplyDeleteThere's a block with some distal caudals embedded in it that you can see from both sides, which also has some associated osteoderms. There's also a partial dorsal vertebra (in not really great condition).
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteDistal caudal vertebrae or distal caudal osteoderms?
ReplyDelete