The holotype of Euoplocephalus isn't very complete, as
holotypes go. So, one of the first things I had to figure out for this project
was whether or not the holotype of Euoplocephalus had any diagnostic features.
Euoplocephalus was certainly unique when it was named – no other dinosaurs had
the pattern of flat, polygonal plates on the skull like CMN 0210 has, and Lambe
wasn't even entirely sure what the cervical half ring was (he suggested it
might have been the back of a frill or crest).
Here it is again: CMN 0210, holotype of Euoplocephalus tutus.
A lot of times, features that are unique or diagnostic to a
species when it is named are later found to be present in other closely related
dinosaur species. There's a great term for this – character obsolescence (Wilson and Upchurch 2003). Anodontosaurus, named by Sternberg in 1929, had similar
flat polygonal plates on the skull. And although Ankylosaurus was named in
1908, a skull was not known for some time – but it too has flat polygonal
plates on the skull. So, this pattern isn't necessarily a diagnostic or unique
feature for Euoplocephalus.
Paul Penkalski looked at variation of skulls referred to Euoplocephalus in 2001, and noted that there were a couple of different
morphologies represented by cervical half rings. Is the cervical half ring of
CMN 0210 unique? Luckily for me, the University of Alberta has an excellent
ankylosaur specimen called UALVP 31. Collected by GF Sternberg in 1921 and
described by Gilmore in 1923, the skull has been on display in our paleontology museum
for several decades.
And here's UALVP 31's skull on display, plus the tail club UALVP 16247.
But more than the skull was collected – the cervical half
rings, part of the hips and leg, a scapula, and other bits and pieces had been
collected but never prepared! So, I dug out the half rings and other pieces and
got to work.
Hop in the wayback machine, here's a picture from 2007, my first year at the U of A, working on the cervical half rings of UALVP 31.
Preparing the material took a couple of years, because I did
it in bits and snags around my research and other projects. I had help from
several of my fellow grad students and technicians – Robin Sissons did the
scapula, Mike Burns and Kristina Barclay helped with the pelvis, and Ian
Macdonald and Clive Coy assisted with some of the trickier parts like the
poorly-preserved second cervical half ring.
You guys, opening up old jackets is hard! Anyway, this is Mike and Robin in 2008 being awesome weirdos.
In 2009, I decided to supervise two high school students in
the University of Alberta's WISEST Summer Research Program. WISEST (Women in
Scholarship, Engineering, Science and Technology) is an awesome organization
that organizes conferences for junior high and high school students, and
supports grad students, postdocs, and early career professionals on campus.
Their Summer Research Program places high school students into university labs
for about 6 weeks during the summer, and by the end the students produce and
present a poster discussing what they've been up to. In 2009 I was joined by
Carmen Chornell and Idel Riemer, who were enthusiastic and excellent fossil
preparators! Together we completed preparing the UALVP 31 pelvis, as well as
other small bits.
Carmen works away on the pelvis and leg...
...while Idel puts the finishing touches on some osteoderms.
The UALVP 31 cervical half ring turned out pretty neat, but
I needed more information to figure out if the half ring of CMN 0210 was
unique. I visited lots of museums to see what the half rings of other
"Euoplocephalus" specimens looked like, and to see the half rings of
other species of ankylosaurs. Thankfully, it seems that the half ring of CMN
0210 is diagnostic, so Euoplocephalus is a real taxon after all. The first cervical half ring has 6 tall, keeled osteoderms, and each pair has a
distinct morphology. The middle (medial) pair are tall, with a centrally
located apex to the keel. The lateral pair also have a keel, but it's kind of
sigmoidal (or, S-shaped). The distal pair, which cover the tips of the band,
are flange-shaped. Some specimens, like UALVP 31, are missing the distal
osteoderms – these don't seem to fuse on as tightly, so it's possible that they
are more easily broken off before fossilization. The half ring of UALVP 31 shares the same morphology as CMN
0210, and so UALVP 31 was one of the few specimens that I could confidently
refer to Euoplocephalus for a long time (another being AMNH 5406). UALVP 31 was
the only one of these that had a complete skull.
On the left, CMN 0210, in the middle is UALVP 31, and on the right is AMNH 5406.
In the next post, I'll talk
about figuring out variation in the cranial ornamentation in Euoplocephalus
skulls.
AND HERE ARE SOME PAPERS!
Arbour VM, Currie PJ. 2013. Euoplocephalus tutus and the diversity of ankylosaurid dinosaurs in the Late Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada, and Montana, USA. PLOS ONE 8: e62421.
Brown B. 1908. The Ankylosauridae, a new family of armored dinosaurs from the Upper Cretaceous. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 24:187–201.
Gilmore CW. 1923. A new species of Corythosaurus with notes on other Belly River Dinosauria. Canadian Field Naturalist 37: 1–9.
Lambe LM. 1902. New genera and species from the Belly River Series (mid-Cretaceous). Geological Survey of Canada Contributions to Canadian Palaeontology 3: 25–81.
Lambe LM. 1910. Note on the parietal crest of Centrosaurus apertus and a proposed new generic name for Stereocephalus tutus. Ottawa Naturalist 14: 149–151.
Penkalski P. 2001. Variation in specimens referred to Euoplocephalus tutus. In: Carpenter K (ed.) The Armored Dinosaurs. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 363-385.
Wilson JA, Upchurch P. 2003. A revision of Titanosaurus Lydekker (Dinosauria – Sauropoda), the first dinosaur genus with a “Gondwanan” distribution. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 1:125-160.
Perhaps the name "Pseudoplocephalus" would be a good name for the Scolosaurus-with-an-Anodontosaurus-tail-club we've all been seeing as Euoplocephalus before now.
ReplyDeleteThat is, in fact, largely where the title for this blog comes from! I desperately wanted to use Pseudoplocephalus for some of the referred Euoplocephalus specimens that were not actually Euoplocephalus, but alas, all could be referred to existing names.
ReplyDelete